Wandering China

An East/West pulse of China's fourth rise from down under.

Islands dispute needs a dose of reality [China Post]


From the Taiwan’s leading English-language paper (with 400,000 readers) China Post: toward a middle path and how this generation’s leaders still lack a common language on the Diaoyu dispute.

Japan should acknowledge that there is a dispute over the ownership of the islands. This does not mean giving up its own claim, or indeed the control that it has over them. But the first step to the resolution of a problem is the recognition of its existence.

Japan and China should then hold talks about their dispute. China’s claim is rooted in history, and it is by no means trivial. But, as they say, possession is nine-tenths of the law, and Japan has actually possessed these islands for most of the last century, so an international court may well rule in Tokyo’s favor.

– – –

Islands dispute needs a dose of reality
By Frank Ching
Source – China Post, published September 19, 2012

“Our generation is not wise enough to find a common language on this question,” Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping said in 1978 about his country’s territorial dispute with Japan. “Our next generation will certainly be wiser. They will certainly find a solution acceptable to all.”

In the meantime, Deng proposed, the two sides should jointly develop the area’s rich economic resources.

Thirty-four years later, there is still no common language on the disputed Diaoyu — or Senkaku — islands. In fact, the situation has reached critical proportions, with protests breaking out in dozens of cities across China over the Japanese government’s decision to nationalize the islands.

Japan insists that the decision to buy three islands from their private owner was taken to prevent them from being purchased by the Tokyo metropolitan government, which is headed by the right-wing nationalist Shintaro Ishihara, whose plans include activities on the islands likely to provoke China.

Beijing, however, sees this as merely an excuse for Japan to strengthen its legal standing over the islands vis-a-vis China.

From the Chinese standpoint, nationalization is a change in the status quo that has persisted since the dispute first arose in the 1970s.

The problem is that while top Japanese officials in the early days seemed to go along with Deng’s proposal, the Japanese government today doesn’t acknowledge an agreement to shelve the dispute. Japan officially doesn’t even recognize the existence of a Chinese claim.

In 2010, at the height of the last crisis over the islands, then Japanese Foreign Minister Seiji Maehara said that Japan had never agreed to shelve the sovereignty dispute. He said Deng had made a unilateral statement that Japan never agreed to.

The Chinese foreign ministry, in a statement protesting against Japan’s nationalization, recalled that when China and Japan established diplomatic relations in 1972, leaders on both sides agreed to leave “the issue of the Diaoyu Island to be resolved later.”

The ministry spokesman, Hong Lei, called on Japan to “return to the track of settling the dispute through negotiations.”

In the current, highly emotive atmosphere, it will not be easy to give diplomacy a chance to resolve the issue. But when things quiet down the two sides should contemplate the situation they are in.

What is needed on both sides is an acknowledgement of reality. The current situation, under which Japanese coast guard vessels call on Chinese surveillance ships to leave Japanese waters and are told in turn that they should leave Chinese territorial seas immediately, has a surreal quality, to say the least.

Japan should acknowledge that there is a dispute over the ownership of the islands. This does not mean giving up its own claim, or indeed the control that it has over them. But the first step to the resolution of a problem is the recognition of its existence.

Japan and China should then hold talks about their dispute. China’s claim is rooted in history, and it is by no means trivial. But, as they say, possession is nine-tenths of the law, and Japan has actually possessed these islands for most of the last century, so an international court may well rule in Tokyo’s favor.

But that won’t happen since neither China nor Japan is prepared to allow a court to make a binding resolution. So the deadlock over sovereignty will continue.

That being the case, the two sides should work out practical measures to prevent future conflicts.

The most practical solution is to allow the status quo to continue. That is to say, the islands will remain under Japanese administration.

The islands, after all, have little intrinsic value. That is why they are uninhabited. Their value lies in the natural resources in and below the sea.

Both China and Japan have reason to compromise if reason can still prevail over emotions.

At present, neither side can exploit the rich energy resources in the area. Although Japan administers the islands, it has refrained from doing so for fear of provoking China.

It has been more than a generation since Deng sought to set aside Sino-Japanese differences in favor of joint development. In that period, no one has come up with a better idea.

In the absence of an alternative, it is high time for both China and Japan to seriously think about joint development of the oil and natural gas resources that both countries want.

They should give Deng’s proposal a chance to work. As recent events show, confrontation doesn’t work. Now both sides should give peace, cooperation and mutual benefit a chance.

– – –

To contact the writer – Frank.ching@gmail.com Twitter: @FrankChing1

Advertisements

Filed under: Beijing Consensus, Charm Offensive, Chinese Model, Culture, Diaoyu Fishing Boat Incident 2010, East China Sea, Economics, Environment, Government & Policy, Influence, International Relations, japan, Law, Mapping Feelings, Media, military, Nationalism, Peaceful Development, Politics, Public Diplomacy, Resources, Soft Power, Strategy, Territorial Disputes, The Chinese Identity, The construction of Chinese and Non-Chinese identities, , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,575 other followers

East/West headlines of Rising China

East/West headlines of Rising China

About Wandering China

Click to find out more about this project

Support //WC

Support Wandering China now - buy a Tee Shirt!

Be a champ - Support Wandering China - buy a Tee Shirt!

The East Wind Wave

China in images and infographics, by Wandering China

China in images and Infographics, by Wandering China

Wandering China: Facing west

Please click to access video

Travels in China's northwest and southwest

Wandering Taiwan

Wandering Taiwan: reflections of my travels in the democratic Republic of China

Wandering China, Resounding Deng Slideshow

Click here to view the Wandering China, Resounding Deng Slideshow

Slideshow reflection on Deng Xiaoping's UN General Assembly speech in 1974. Based on photos of my travels in China 2011.

East Asia Geographic Timelapse

Click here to view the East Asia Geographic Timelapse

A collaboration with my brother: Comparing East Asia's rural and urban landscapes through time-lapse photography.

Wandering Planets

Creative Commons License
Wandering China by Bob Tan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at Wanderingchina.org. Thank you for visiting //
web stats

Flag Counter

free counters
Online Marketing
Add blog to our directory.
%d bloggers like this: